Sample
Six prompts to try, before you decide anything.
Free
forever
6 of the 21 prompts
Copy and paste, no setup
Works with ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini
No account, no card
Enhance your writing
Enhance your writing
A prompt library to enhance your unique human experiences. Your writing, from angles never read before.
A prompt library to enhance your unique human experiences. Your writing, from angles never read before.
You already know what you want to say. These prompts ask the right questions, catch what you’d have missed, and get it out of your head in your own voice.
Made for the writing you already do
Made for the writing
you already do
Made for the writing you already do
Substack
Unique newsletters. Repurposed notes. Brainstorming interesting subjects.
Instagram / Facebook
Scroll-stopping hooks. Faster and more consistent posting in your tone.
Everything to
preserve human craft
Everything to
preserve human craft
Think clearer, more human
Our prompts open your mind and create clarity, so more of your human side shows in everything you write.
Think clearer, more human
Our prompts open your mind and create clarity, so more of your human side shows in everything you write.
Faster from idea to draft
Everything you need is there from the start, so drafts come together faster and with far less frustration.
Faster from idea to draft
Everything you need is there from the start, so drafts come together faster and with far less frustration.
Like no other tool, Feel the difference.
Like no other tool.
Feel the difference.
Like no other tool, Feel the difference.
Standard AI
At the beginning of the year, a new idea began to take shape. Driven by ambition, curiosity, and a desire to build something meaningful, one person decided to start a web agency. There was no perfect plan, only a clear sense that it was time to move forward. With a laptop, a simple vision, and the willingness to learn along the way, the first steps were taken. What started as a small decision soon felt like the beginning of something much bigger, full of new possibilities.
Vague, no depth, too general. Polished, but it could be written by anyone.
Hedvig
The plan felt solid at the time. My family was supportive, they said that if anyone could pull this off it was me. I’ve been a frontend developer since 2022. AI had made building websites way faster than it used to be. There are only 2-3 other web agencies where I live, all of them honestly a bit outdated. Mostly old WordPress builds without AI adoption. Local roots seemed like an advantage. I’d be the guy in town who makes modern websites. Easy.
Your tone, your feelings, your experiences. Readers instantly resonate with your writing.
Try before you spend a single penny
Try before you
spend a single penny
Get full access
Voice fingerprint
Here are three things I’ve written: [paste]. Don’t comment on quality. Reverse-engineer the rules my writing already follows and return them as a reusable card with five sections: sentence rhythm (typical length, where I break it, how I open paragraphs), punctuation habits (what I overuse, what I never touch), recurring hedges and filler I use on purpose, the moves I never make, and five words or constructions that appear in all three pieces. Quote one real example from my text under every rule. Where two pieces contradict each other, say so instead of averaging them out. End with the three rules that would break my voice fastest if violated.
The questions after the questions
I want to write about [topic]. Interview me in three rounds and write nothing until I say go. Round one: five questions about what happened, plain facts, no interpretation. Wait for my answers. Round two: five questions that follow the thread I gave least detail on — go where I was vague, not where I was fluent. Wait. Round three: three questions about what I still haven’t said, including the part I’d be uncomfortable publishing. After each round, tell me in one line which answer holds the most usable material and why. If an answer of mine sounds like something I’ve read somewhere, say so and ask again.
Flinch finder
Read this draft: [paste]. Find every place where I got abstract right at the point it turned personal — general statements, borrowed phrasing, sudden shifts to “you” or “we”, passive constructions around the part that cost me something. For each one: quote the sentence, name what I likely skipped over, and ask me the question that would get the real version out. Don’t fix anything and don’t offer replacement lines. Rank the findings by how much the piece would improve if I answered honestly. If you find nothing, say the draft is already exposed and stop.
Attention drop map
First, build a profile of my likely reader from this draft: [paste]. Tell me what you assume about their patience, what they already know, and what would make them close the tab. Ask me to confirm or correct it before continuing. Then read the draft as that person, paragraph by paragraph, and mark every point where their attention drops — with the reason: too slow, already knew this, don’t believe it, lost the thread, don’t care yet. Give me a running list in order, not a summary. Then name the single paragraph carrying the most weight for that reader, and the paragraph they’d never miss if it disappeared.
Reverse outline
Read this draft: [paste] and extract the outline that actually exists, not the one I intended. One line per paragraph, in my own words where possible, stating what that paragraph does — sets up, argues, illustrates, digresses, repeats, lands. Then answer four questions plainly: what is the piece actually about, where does the real opening sentence sit, which paragraph is the buried point, and which two paragraphs are making the same move twice. Finish with the order the paragraphs would need to be in for the argument to work, listed by number. Don’t rewrite a single sentence.
Archive pattern
Here are eight to ten things I’ve published: [paste titles and text]. Ignore the stated topics. Find what I keep circling back to across all of them — the recurring tension, the enemy I keep naming, the thing I defend without being asked. Show me the evidence: quote the line from each piece where the pattern surfaces. Then tell me what this makes my actual subject, in one sentence, phrased the way I’d phrase it. Then name three pieces I haven’t written that sit at the center of that pattern instead of the edge, and say for each one why it’s uncomfortable to write.
Voice fingerprint
Here are three things I’ve written: [paste]. Don’t comment on quality. Reverse-engineer the rules my writing already follows and return them as a reusable card with five sections: sentence rhythm (typical length, where I break it, how I open paragraphs), punctuation habits (what I overuse, what I never touch), recurring hedges and filler I use on purpose, the moves I never make, and five words or constructions that appear in all three pieces. Quote one real example from my text under every rule. Where two pieces contradict each other, say so instead of averaging them out. End with the three rules that would break my voice fastest if violated.
The questions after the questions
I want to write about [topic]. Interview me in three rounds and write nothing until I say go. Round one: five questions about what happened, plain facts, no interpretation. Wait for my answers. Round two: five questions that follow the thread I gave least detail on — go where I was vague, not where I was fluent. Wait. Round three: three questions about what I still haven’t said, including the part I’d be uncomfortable publishing. After each round, tell me in one line which answer holds the most usable material and why. If an answer of mine sounds like something I’ve read somewhere, say so and ask again.
Flinch finder
Read this draft: [paste]. Find every place where I got abstract right at the point it turned personal — general statements, borrowed phrasing, sudden shifts to “you” or “we”, passive constructions around the part that cost me something. For each one: quote the sentence, name what I likely skipped over, and ask me the question that would get the real version out. Don’t fix anything and don’t offer replacement lines. Rank the findings by how much the piece would improve if I answered honestly. If you find nothing, say the draft is already exposed and stop.
Attention drop map
First, build a profile of my likely reader from this draft: [paste]. Tell me what you assume about their patience, what they already know, and what would make them close the tab. Ask me to confirm or correct it before continuing. Then read the draft as that person, paragraph by paragraph, and mark every point where their attention drops — with the reason: too slow, already knew this, don’t believe it, lost the thread, don’t care yet. Give me a running list in order, not a summary. Then name the single paragraph carrying the most weight for that reader, and the paragraph they’d never miss if it disappeared.
Reverse outline
Read this draft: [paste] and extract the outline that actually exists, not the one I intended. One line per paragraph, in my own words where possible, stating what that paragraph does — sets up, argues, illustrates, digresses, repeats, lands. Then answer four questions plainly: what is the piece actually about, where does the real opening sentence sit, which paragraph is the buried point, and which two paragraphs are making the same move twice. Finish with the order the paragraphs would need to be in for the argument to work, listed by number. Don’t rewrite a single sentence.
Archive pattern
Here are eight to ten things I’ve published: [paste titles and text]. Ignore the stated topics. Find what I keep circling back to across all of them — the recurring tension, the enemy I keep naming, the thing I defend without being asked. Show me the evidence: quote the line from each piece where the pattern surfaces. Then tell me what this makes my actual subject, in one sentence, phrased the way I’d phrase it. Then name three pieces I haven’t written that sit at the center of that pattern instead of the edge, and say for each one why it’s uncomfortable to write.
Free to start,
yours to keep.
Free to start,
yours to keep.
Full library
All 21 prompts, including the ones you would not have thought to ask.
$29
once
All 21 prompts, every category
Lifetime access, no subscription
New prompts added at no extra cost
Copy-ready for any AI tool
Any questions?
Reach out via Substack.
Writers who got their
thoughts out and time back.
“The interview prompts got things out of me I didn’t know I wanted to say. My writing sounds more like me now, not less.”
Wren Ashcombe
Writes on slow living
“The interview prompts got things out of me I didn’t know I wanted to say. My writing sounds more like me now, not less.”
Wren Ashcombe
Writes on slow living
“I stopped fighting the blank page. The questions do the digging — I just answer them and clean it up.”
Fenwick Doyle
Writes on tech culture
“I stopped fighting the blank page. The questions do the digging — I just answer them and clean it up.”
Fenwick Doyle
Writes on tech culture
“It caught the details I always forget until it’s too late. Every piece ships tighter now.”
Marlowe Sinclair
Writes on personal finance
“It caught the details I always forget until it’s too late. Every piece ships tighter now.”
Marlowe Sinclair
Writes on personal finance
“I used to circle the same idea for an hour before writing a word. The prompts get me to the point in ten minutes.”
Osian Blackwood
Writes on startup life
“It asks the questions an editor would ask. I answer honestly and the draft almost writes itself.”
Juniper Vane
Writes on creative writing craft
“I stopped dreading the first draft. The hard thinking happens before I open the document.”
Sable Winthrop
Writes on climate and ecology
“The finished piece still sounds like me — just clearer, and without the padding I usually leave in.”
Cassius Meadowcroft
Writes on philosophy and ethics
“It pushes on structure and tone, not just wording. That is the part I always got wrong alone.”
Thistle Ravenscar
Writes on internet culture
“Newsletter, essay, or a short post — the same prompts work without me rethinking my process.”
Bramwell Foxley
Writes on food and cooking
“The interview prompts got things out of me I didn’t know I wanted to say. My writing sounds more like me now, not less.”
Wren Ashcombe
Writes on slow living
“I stopped fighting the blank page. The questions do the digging — I just answer them and clean it up.”
Fenwick Doyle
Writes on tech culture
“It caught the details I always forget until it’s too late. Every piece ships tighter now.”
Marlowe Sinclair
Writes on personal finance
“The finished piece still sounds like me — just clearer, and without the padding I usually leave in.”
Cassius Meadowcroft
Writes on philosophy and ethics
“It pushes on structure and tone, not just wording. That is the part I always got wrong alone.”
Thistle Ravenscar
Writes on internet culture
“Newsletter, essay, or a short post — the same prompts work without me rethinking my process.”
Bramwell Foxley
Writes on food and cooking
“I used to circle the same idea for an hour before writing a word. The prompts get me to the point in ten minutes.”
Osian Blackwood
Writes on startup life
“It asks the questions an editor would ask. I answer honestly and the draft almost writes itself.”
Juniper Vane
Writes on creative writing craft
“I stopped dreading the first draft. The hard thinking happens before I open the document.”
Sable Winthrop
Writes on climate and ecology